Economic
stimulus package brought a huge opportunity to fisher folk community. However
the project is inhibited by cultural attitudes and behavior. In Ahero for
instance fisher folk are experiencing losses due to poisoning of fish ponds
hence killing all aquatic in the pond. Community members need to know
eradication of poverty and hunger is the responsibility of everybody and such
negative behaviors retrogress development.
KENYA PRODUCERS COALITION
We believe in farmers getting value for the work they do in the field despite their religion, sex ,financial status.
Friday, 19 October 2012
FIsher Folk
1.
Background of Fishing community around
Lake Victoria
Fishing
is the primary economic activity of the communities on or near the Lake
Victoria. The communities are directly or indirectly involved in fishing either
as fishermen or women, processing, buying or selling fish. The life of the
Kenyan fisher folk around Lake Victoria revolves around the daily catch.
The
annual catch from the Kenyan side of Lake Victoria is estimated to rake in 7
billion shillings in terms of revenue1,
making it the third largest foreign exchange earner for the economy-having
catapulted over coffee and tea exports in terms of value.
Ironically,
the actual fisher folk continue to wallow in abject poverty and are prone to
the ravages of HIV/AIDS.
1.1
Challenges faced in the fishing
industry
In
terms of demographics, the majority of the fisher folk fall within the youth
age bracket. Every year, approximately 500,000 young people join the Kenyan
labour market- with close to 70% remaining unemployed. These statistics are
replayed in microcosm within the Lake Victoria fishing industry.
It
is estimated that Kenyan side of Lake Victoria which comprises of 6% of this
fresh water mass can realistically support only 10,000 fisher folk. In reality,
up to ten times this number are engaged directly in fishing activity- creating
enormous pressure on this scarce resource, leading to the danger of the eventual
depletion of the available fish stock on the Kenyan side of Lake Victoria.
Apart
from over fishing, the other major challenge facing the Kenyan fisher folk of
Lake Victoria has to do with the fact that the vast majority do not own their
own boats and fishing gear, but are employed by unscrupulous businessmen. To
compound this problem, the fisher folk are at the mercy of well connected
buyers (from outside the community) who dictate the whole sale price and are
able to load the daily catch in their refrigerated trucks at rock bottom, throw
away rates, only to turn around and make a killing with huge mark ups when
these buyers supply the wider Kenyan lucrative retail and export market.
One
of the negative side effects of the pressure on the fisher folk propelled by
poverty is sexual exploitation. Among the most blatant manifestations of this
malaise is the so called “jaboya system”
– a system whereby women selling fish are forced to have sex with the fishermen
just to be given the opportunity of buying from the catch. As a young fisherman
said, “For us in the fishing communities, sex is like money.” This practice of
exploiting women exacerbates the serious health crisis posed by the HIV/AIDS
pandemic.
HIV
prevalence levels among the fisher folk along the shores of Lake Victoria on
the Kenyan side are high. Fishing districts in Kenya report HIV infection rate
as high as five times that of inland districts. For instance, while the
national HIV prevalence for 2006 in Kenya stood at 5.8% that in Suba area near
Lake Victoria was at 21% with a life expectancy of 37 years.4 The fact that the life of
the Kenyan fisher folk revolves around the daily catch, when the fish move,
large numbers of the community move with them re-forming a community on another
shore, or another island and even another country on the lake-whether Uganda or
Tanzania. This itinerant group of men and women are separated from their
extended families for very long periods in the year with all the dire social
and health consequences.
- Recommendations
Given
the gloomy picture painted in the preceding paragraphs, what is to be done?
We
suggest the following but should not be limited to:
●
Value
addition should start right from the lake shore. No fish should be transported
from the landing site before being processed. The bones, scales and other
wastes must be left at the landing site. These by products can be used as
spinoffs to set up a complementary cottage industry targeting tourists;
●
Cold
storage facilities to be made available at every landing site to help the
fishermen have bargaining power on their products;
●
Loans
and financial assistance to be extended to the fishers.
●
Fisher folk cooperatives societies should be
restricted to so as to prioritize the fisher folk needs and not businessmen and
middlemen who aim to impoverish the fishermen.
●
Pass
necessary legislation on fishing that should cater for both the fish and the
fisherfolk and ensure security to the fishing communities;
●
Encourage
women to initiate income generating activities to empower them so that they are
not prone to sexual exploitation;
●
Ministry
of Fishing should enforce legislation to regulate fishing, setting benchmarks
for those who want to enter the fishing industry;
●
Under
the new constitutional dispensation and in particular reference to devolved
governance, ensure that the local fishing communities retain control of their
resources and the attendant revenues and benefits;
●
Eliminate
middlemen from the chain of supply and pass on this role to cooperatives
started and managed by the fisher folk themselves;
●
Entrench
awareness raising, support and related HIV/AIDS services
Widow in Nandi Making Ends Meet In Nandi Hills
Nandi Case
Rural women play a key role in
supporting their households and communities in achieving food and nutrition
security, generating income, and improving rural livelihoods and overall
well-being. They contribute to agriculture and rural enterprises and fuel local
and global economies. As such, they are active players in achieving the MDGs.
Yet, every day, around the world, rural women and girls face persistent
structural constraints that prevent them from fully enjoying their human rights
and hamper their efforts to improve their lives as well as those of others
around them. In this sense, they are also an important target group for the
MDGs.
Most women farmers are still
compounded in subsistence and small scale farming rather than cash crop
production. Women farmers smallholders cultivate traditional food crops for
subsistence and sale, whereas men are more likely to own medium to large
commercial farms and are better able to capitalize on the expansion of
agricultural tradable goods. Farms managed by women are generally characterized
by low levels of mechanization and technological inputs, which often translate
into low productivity.
Wage employment allows women to
get out of the relative isolation of the home or their small rural communities
and gain self-esteem and confidence.
Effective access and use of
information and communication technologies can improve rural women’s leadership
and participation in community and economic development activities. However,
rural women are at the lowest level of the digital gender divide. According to
findings of the International Telecommunication Union, limited infrastructure,
affordability and education are the main barriers for rural women in Africa.
Time, geographical location of facilities and social and cultural norms
constitute additional constraints.35 The improvement of access for rural women
and their participation in information and communication technologies will continue
to be limited if access to infrastructure, such as roads and transport, education,
training and economic resources, including financing, is not increased. Multiple
forms of media and communication technologies reach more women in rural areas.
dairy cows grazing |
tree nursery |
tree nursery |
tree nursery |
slopes of the Nandi hills |
nandi hills |
nandi hills |
nandi hiils |
nandi hills |
Wednesday, 17 October 2012
Why Give a Damn:
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime. This is not enough for the men and women living in extreme poverty.
In 1978, India became a net grain exporter after adopting green revolution miracle seeds and rapidly expanding land under irrigation, yet 230 million people in India today remain malnourished, and malnutrition accounts for 50% of child deaths. How can it be that a country like India, which has produced a surplus in grain crops for more than thirty years, still has 230 million hungry people?
While increasing food production in India was successful in eliminating regular devastating famines, it did little to eradicate extreme poverty, which underlies chronic malnutrition. The fact is that the root cause of food insecurity is extreme poverty, not just shortfalls in food production. When very poor people find ways to grow their income, they buy the food they need and the market finds ways to bring it to them more efficiently than disaster relief or food distribution programs. The most direct way to end food insecurity is to help very poor rural people increase their income from farming.
Most of the 800 million or so hungry people in the world today live in poor rural areas in developing countries and earn their living from one-acre farms. They are strongly motivated to grow enough rice, wheat or corn to feed their families for the whole year, but most of them don’t have enough land, or the right kind of land to eliminate their hunger. So they and their families live on one meal a day or less for three or four months while they wait for the next rice crop to come in. My colleagues and I at International Development Enterprises (IDE) have had good results helping small farmers improve their food production with simple strategies like poking a hole in the ground with a stick between rice plants, and putting a sustained release capsule of urea in the hole. Adopting new approaches like SRI (System for Rice Intensification) can help even more.
But even if they have enough land, water and money to invest in fertilizer to produce a surplus of grain, selling it on the market is a loser’s bet for a small farmer- crops like rice rarely produce net income of more than $200 an acre, and most dollar a day farmers only have one acre to work with.
If a poor one acre farmer in India is in a position to plant an acre of rice and sell it, he might earn $200 net. If that same farmer instead decides instead to grow drip irrigated,
labor-intensive off-season fruits, vegetable and, spices, they can regularly earn $1,000 after expenses from a quarter acre. This is more than enough to buy all the food the family needs, and move out of poverty and into the middle class.
My friends at IDE and I have seen this happen thousands of times. To make it happen, it takes a whole new approach to small farm agriculture, new research to optimize it, and a last-mile private sector mass dissemination and training initiative.
If we have the courage to do it, I have no doubt that at least a hundred million of the 230 million hungry people now in India, and their brothers and sisters in other developing countries, can end their food insecurity forever.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)